you asked to get there? If people want to do that, they can just buy a set of finger puppets and play the thing out at home. But this? Picking an end point and watching yourself get there because. That's why this might have worked if your choices had not gone as you anticipated - picking Paul in that moment led you to end up single, something like that. The enjoyment of fiction lives in the meeting of your mind as a reader or viewer with the specifics of other people's brilliant, weird, flawed, unexpected minds. I cannot get excited about the idea of a bespoke, AI-generated movie that I order up like a pizza. But successful interactive storytelling has models to learn from, and they generally involve iterative choices that take you down branching paths, not "which guy do you want to end up with" questions that just kind of. That's not to say there aren't beloved games with multiple endings there absolutely are. The same is true of the beloved game The Last of Us, which not only has a single ending, but has a single controversial ending. What you do not do is get an endings list from which you get to choose. They look like the wonderful and haunting video game Kentucky Route Zero, a seemingly simple point-and-click game over the course of which you make many, many choices about where to go next, what to say, what to do. But I also think it fails to understand that interactive storytelling already has some very successful models, and they don't look like this. It's profoundly unsatisfying, and I think it conceptually fails to understand how much of fiction is about letting a creative person make creative choices and experiencing them as a viewer/reader. Netflix Even the ending you choose can turn out to be profoundly unsatisfying. a total of 15 or so choices over the course of the movie? Something like that? Some of them matter a little, some matter almost not at all. I didn't count, but I would say I probably made. You pick the ending you want, and it gives it to you. I did not watch every minute of the other two ways for the story to go (it doesn't really lend itself to any particular linear or completist viewing in any handy way), but I explored the other possible storylines enough to learn that there's no particular cleverness - it's not as if you pick one but end up with another one, or no matter who you pick, you end up with the same guy, or something like that. I asked myself that too! That's why Paul was my choice, so I picked Paul, so Cami picked Paul, and she ended up with Paul, and. Now, you might ask yourself why a woman with a lovely boyfriend would suddenly leave him for either an old boyfriend she's been apart from for years or a rock star she met at work with whom she's spent a few hours. So in one scene (a scene that is not at the end of the movie!), Cami has to decide between Paul, Jack and Rex. The other two, who quickly turn up, turn out to be her old boyfriend, Jack (Jordi Webber), and a rock star she meets at work, Rex (Avan Jogia). But when she gets a tarot reading because she feels something is missing from her life, she learns that she has three possible suitors. She has a boyfriend, Paul, played by Scott Michael Foster. And it doesn't work narratively here, either.ĭirected by Stuart McDonald and written by Josann McGibbon, Choose Love is about a woman named Cami (Laura Marano) who works as a recording engineer. While it was interesting to see the technology at work (you make a series of choices using your remote, which drives the story forward), it didn't really work narratively. The highest-profile effort up to now was probably the Black Mirror episode "Bandersnatch" in 2018. Into this landscape comes the movie Choose Love, Netflix's most recent experiment in making "interactive" films. Nobody seriously believes that AI is currently in a position to write its own movies with any success, but there have been scenarios floated in which perhaps consumers could use AI-generated scripts and digitally stored copies of actors to essentially choose their own film: "I want a romance starring Ryan Gosling and Emma Stone where she's a bank robber and he's a cop" or something like that. During the ongoing WGA and SAG-AFTRA strikes, one topic of interest has been AI, or artificial intelligence - really, more accurately, machine learning.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |